Author: pkl204

New time lapse video marks Town Hall milestone

A time lapse video of the new Town Hall has been released by Crawley Borough Council, condensing 10 months of construction into just 100 seconds.

The video, which can be viewed at, shows the empty site transformed into a striking nine-storey building. Crawley Borough Council will occupy the bottom 3.5 floors and rent out commercial space on the upper floors.

The name of the commercial space will be The Create Building. The available floor space is between 14,000 sq ft and 77,000 sq ft and Crawley-based SHW are marketing this on behalf of the council. For more information visit

The landmark building, which is expected to be ready for occupation in February 2022, is part of a wider regeneration scheme at the eastern end of The Boulevard in Crawley town centre.

The scheme also includes 273 flats (of which 109 will be affordable), a new public square, public realm improvements, ground floor commercial space for a restaurant/café and district energy centre. It is a joint development between Crawley Borough Council and Westrock.

The entire redevelopment is transforming a major town centre opportunity site. The new Town Hall will:

  • Secure the council’s finances through the ability to generate new revenue from commercial office tenants whilst achieving significant savings on the council’s current running costs
  • Provide a better, fit-for-purpose building for customers, staff and councillors
  • Contribute to achieving the council’s wider ambitions around affordable housing, post-Covid economic recovery, and tackling climate change.

Councillor Peter Lamb, Leader of Crawley Borough Council, said: “We are facing enormous challenges as a town: Financial, as we are forced to keep doing more with less. Social, as we struggle with a housing crisis decades in the making. Environmental, as we need to move quickly to zero-carbon to avoid climate catastrophe. The redevelopment of the town hall site is a vital part of Crawley’s efforts to meet all three challenges.”

For more information visit

Deal reached over the running of Crawley Borough Council

After several weeks of negotiations, the Labour Group and the council’s Independent member—Cllr Rory Fiveash, have announced that they have agreed a deal over the running of Crawley Borough Council for the coming council year.

Following the local elections, no party was left with overall control of Crawley Borough Council, with the council consisting of 18 Conservatives, 17 Labour and one Independent councillor.

With a Labour councillor holding the casting vote at tonight’s Annual Council meeting, the deal means that for the coming year there will be a Labour-Independent coalition of 18 councillors, able to use a casting vote to provide stable leadership for the next 12 months.

While all groups of councillors have engaged in discussions over recent weeks, from the start it was clear that the shared beliefs and values of Cllr Fiveash and the council’s Labour members provided the strongest basis upon which to address the problems currently facing the town.

As part of the coalition deal, the council will be mothballing rather than closing the Millpond and Creasys Drive adventure playgrounds and seeking new delivery models for the sites, in addition to providing a 12-month extension to the Government’s eviction ban in relation to council properties. Cllr Fiveash will also be taking the role of Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Resources in the administration.

Cllr Lamb said:

‘Crawley faces enormous challenges over the year ahead, as we seek to rebuild from the pandemic. Cllr Fiveash’s decision to work with us gives the council the stability we need to tackle these challenges head on and I look forward to working closely with Rory again.’

Cllr Fiveash said:

‘I am pleased that we have reached an agreement to work together and, with our shared values and principles, I believe that we can offer a bright and secure future for the people of Crawley as our town recovers from the pandemic.’

Crawley Observer Column, Wednesday 26th May 2021

Three weeks on from the local elections, the result will finally be decided at the Annual Council this Friday.

After two years without an election, when voters went to the polls they delivered a hung council in which there are 18 Conservative, 17 Labour and 1 Independent councillor who was elected as Labour in a seat which strongly voted Labour this year. This means that council control will be determined by a No Confidence vote on Friday in which the Labour Deputy Mayor, following the resignation of the Mayor, has the casting vote. With everything so finely balanced, one person and one person alone will decide who runs Crawley this Friday: the council’s Independent member.

Whatever the outcome of the vote, the council will be balanced precariously for the next year, with an opposition having the casting vote on most of the council’s committees and with a single absence at a Full Council meeting potentially seeing council control flipping back and forth.

Even during normal times this would be a cause for concern, but these are not normal times. The world hasn’t yet defeated COVID-19, never mind the challenges which follow in its wake. Crawley’s economy has been hit harder than any other in the country by the Government’s Coronavirus restrictions, yet most of the effects still haven’t been felt and won’t be until the current job projections finally come to an end. When they do we will certainly feel the impact as a town.

With the ban on evictions ending in a week’s time, the tidal wave of private sector evictions we are likely to face of people no longer able to afford their rent will also make itself known. The risk for new public service cuts is also likely, as the sector faces the fact that a decade of austerity has destroyed the financial security of the whole sector.

Getting through these challenges and more, means all those on the council doing what they often claim in leaflets: putting Crawley first, and doing everything we can to get the town through the biggest challenges it has ever faced.

Crawley Observer Column, Wednesday 19th May 2021

The UK’s housing crisis didn’t start with the pandemic. Its roots can be found in the 1984 Housing Act, Margaret Thatcher’s attempt to end the role of local government in providing affordable housing, and it will take decades of effort by committed councils to make good this historic mistake.

However, COVID-19 has certainly made the problem worse. During the first lockdown there were two main housing-related pressures. The first was the need to get rough sleepers into socially distanced accommodation to limit the spread of the virus, before transitioning them into permanent housing. While not everyone took up this effort or found maintaining a tenancy sustainable, the effort was largely successful, although incurring a far higher cost than the Government’s funding covered.

The second pressure was how to keep people housed when the lockdown would inevitably result in a loss of household income. The Government’s solution was a mortgage holiday and a ban on evictions, that way people would be less likely to take risks around employment and they would have somewhere to self-isolate until the danger had passed.

From the start, this was a much better deal for home owners, who were able to push payments back at no cost to themselves, while renters would continue to incur rent over the whole period. These days, rents tend to be much higher than mortgage payments, which coupled with renters being more likely to occupy lower paid and more insecure work means that there will be a tidal wave of evictions when the Government’s ban ceases at the end of this month.

Crawley’s economy has been hit harder than any other in the country, but migration from London makes it unlikely that rents will fall in-line with rising unemployment, so we are going to see the impact of this tidal wave more than most.

We can’t control the private rented sector, although considerable improvement is needed, but we can set an example for them. That is why I am happy to announce that under Labour, the council will extend the ban on evictions a further year beyond the Government’s current deadline.

Crawley Observer Column, Wednesday 12th May 2021

A heartfelt thank you to all those who voted last Thursday. While the results weren’t what I was hoping for, Labour in Crawley suffered the net loss of just a single seat to Conservatives compared to the scores lost in other town of our type. However, that loss puts the town in a difficult position.

Two years ago, the Local Government Boundary Commission revised the Crawley Borough Council ward boundaries, reducing the number of seats from 37 to 36. A number of us warned the commission at the time that having an even number of seats was a recipe for trouble, given Crawley’s history of close results and tendency to only elect two parties, and that it was just a matter of time until we ended up with a divided council.

After Thursday, the council has 18 Conservative, 17 Labour and one Independent former Labour councillor, meaning we are effectively in deadlock for the next year. Crawley’s economy has been hit harder by COVID restrictions than any other, we have a Government agency seeking to build 10,000 houses on our Western boarder, and the pandemic continues to cause major financial problems for the council. The risk now is that rather than addressing these issues, the council spends 12 months unable to take any major decisions.

I don’t believe that anyone wants that for Crawley, I certainly don’t, which is why it’s important some deal is reached between the groups on the council. For the last year Labour and the Conservatives have had a deal, but as Labour hold the casting vote on who the next Mayor will be and consequently who will wield the casting vote for the next year, a Labour-Independent deal would work, as I’m sure a Conservative-Independent deal would also.

Conversations have been taking place around what such deals might look like for the last week and are likely to continue for the next week, with an ultimate cut-off being the deadline for publishing the Annual Council papers on 20th May. Whatever the outcome, Labour councillors will work to deliver the commitments upon which we were elected.

Thank you…but what happens now?

A huge thanks to everyone who took the time to vote in this year’s local elections. The elections saw a 36% turnout, an improvement on the previous local elections despite the pandemic, with record numbers of postal voters.

These were a huge bumper set of elections, with Crawley holding elections for Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner election, every West Sussex County Council seat, a third of Crawley Borough Council seats and an additional two Crawley Borough Council by-elections.

The results for Crawley Labour were clearly disappointing. The reality is that most Labour campaigns focus on heavy community engagement and while we did everything we could to safely speak with voters this time around, we simply couldn’t run the type of campaign which typically delivers wins for Labour.

While we have to wait until Monday to find out who won the Police and Crime Commissioner Election, we already know that in Crawley Labour has seen a net loss of one seat on West Sussex County Council and another net loss of one on Crawley Borough Council since the last set of elections. Considering what has happened to Labour nationally, and particularly in other New Towns, we were expecting to do much worse, but we can’t pretend that this is the result we wanted.

For Crawley, this means the borough council remains in No Overall Control, with the Conservatives having 18 seats, Labour having 17, and 1 Independent (former Labour) councillor. So, what happens next?

Crawley Borough Council operates the ‘Strong Leader Model’ under which day-to-day decisions are delegated to the Council Leader and the Cabinet they appoint, with the Full Council responsible for the big strategic decisions. We elect the Council Leader for a four year term and my current term is due to end in May 2022, but realistically a Leader who cannot deliver a majority on key votes in the chamber will either resign or face a confidence vote in which the council replaces them. The first opportunity for this to happen is the Annual Council meeting, this year the meeting is scheduled for the 28th May, at which point committee and civic appointments for the coming year will be made, most importantly the Mayor.

While the Mayor of Crawley is a largely symbolic position, they are responsible for chairing meetings of the Full Council, as part of which they are granted a casting vote whenever there is a draw. Given the current 18-17-1 split on the council, this appointment has become incredibly important politically and due to the resignation of the last Mayor, the casting vote for this appointment will be made by the current Deputy Mayor, who is currently a Labour councillor.

So, what comes next? While it is possible for us to just wait until the Annual Council and see what happens, everyone seems to want to find a way to ensure stability for the forthcoming year and that means finding some sort of agreement between at least two of the three blocks of councillors. These conversations are happening now, to try to find a reasonable compromise which will ensure the council can deal with the substantial problems facing the council and our community.

I believe that a compromise which will deliver stability for the next year will be reached before the Annual Council, but at this stage I really don’t know what it will look like and ultimately it won’t be down to me to decide. However, based on conversations so far, it’s clear that everyone really wants to ensure an arrangement which will deliver the best for the town over the next year.

The definitive guide to tomorrow’s Election Day in Crawley

Tomorrow (Thursday 6th May) is Election Day and thanks to COVID-19, it is going to be rather unusual.

Due to last years’ elections being postponed we now have a number of council elections all at once. So, when you go to vote you will be voting on who will represent you on Crawley Borough Council, on West Sussex County Council, and as Police and Crime Commissioner (Furnace Green is the odd-one-out as it has no borough council seat up this year).

Both West Sussex County Council and the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner are currently Conservative. Crawley Borough Council isn’t currently controlled by any party, with 16 Conservative, 15 Labour, 2 Independents (elected as Labour), and 2 vacant seats. With just 14 out of 36 council seats up for election this year, the only possible outcomes from this election are a Labour council, a Conservative council, or continued stalemate.

Because there are also by-elections happening in Ifield and Tilgate, electors in those areas will get to vote for two candidates on their Crawley Borough Council ballot paper. The first-placed candidate will get the full four-year term and the second-placed candidate will get the rest of the vacant seat’s term.

Police and Crime Commissioner ballot papers are also unusual, because the votes are counted in two rounds. In the first column you can vote for your favourite candidate, but if they aren’t one of the top two candidates the second column enables you to vote for whichever of the most likely top two candidates you would prefer.

At every Police and Crime Commissioner election in Sussex so far, only the Labour and Conservative candidates have made the second round. At both the last Crawley Borough Council and West Sussex County Council election, Labour and Conservative candidates were the top two contenders in every seat, with no third party candidate coming close to winning a ward.

Polling stations are open from 7am to 10pm. Due to COVID-19, there are special procedures in place at polling stations: sterilising voting areas and controlling the numbers voting at any one time. So, don’t be surprised if there’s a bit of a queue. While it should be possible for people to get in and vote quickly, please try to go at a quieter time and come prepared in case there’s a queue. Remember, if you like to vote last thing, so long as you’ve joined a queue by 10pm you have to be allowed to vote.

To reduce the risk to the public, all the parties in Crawley have agreed not to have people standing at polling stations this year. It’s not the law, so we can’t force people to follow this agreement, but it is a matter of honour and if anyone is seen breaking that agreement I’d encourage voters to think about what it says that they didn’t keep to their word.
You don’t need your polling card to vote, but you will need your mask–unless you are medically exempt, and while the council is planning on having enough pencils for each likely voter, we are recommending that people bring their own pencil or pen just in case.

Most postal voters have already returned their ballots, but if you haven’t managed to post them yet, completed postal ballot packs can still be handed in on the day at any Crawley polling station, either by yourself or someone else on your behalf. Any lost or spoilt postal votes can be replaced by up to 5pm tomorrow by getting in touch with the council. It is also possible to arrange for someone else to cast an emergency proxy vote on your behalf under certain circumstances (such as being unable to vote due to being required to the Coronavirus), so long as this is done before 5pm tomorrow by contacting the council).

Once polling stations are closed the ballot boxes will be held securely by the council overnight (parties are allowed to send representatives to observe this should they choose), before being validated at 9am to on Friday to ensure the number of votes in each box matches the records for the number of ballot papers issued. Crawley Borough Council’s count will begin at 10am, concluding in the late afternoon, after which the West Sussex County Council votes will be counted.

The Police and Crime Commissioner count has been postponed until Monday, with counting taking place in each local authority area simultaneously and the final tabulation based at Brighton and Hove City Council. Special procedures are also being used at the count to protect people’s safety, with social distancing measures and lateral flow testing of those attending the count. While this is only an obligation for those involved in the counting of the votes, parties have all agreed (again, as a matter of honour) that their representatives attending the count will do the same.

For candidates and their supporters, tomorrow is going to be a very long day, over the course of which we will be reminding people that it is Election Day and that it is important to get out and vote. We have procedures in place to do this with the minimum amount of risk, but if you have any issues with what you’ve seen a particular campaigner do then please get in touch with their party so that action can be taken.

Here’s hoping that tomorrow is a dry day and many thanks for doing your democratic duty.

Best wishes,


Cllr Peter Lamb
Leader, Crawley Borough Council 

Letter to the Secretary of State on West of Ifield

Over recent weeks a number of new questions have arisen regarding the proposed West of Ifield development, what is driving it, and what options are available for preventing or amending the proposals. There are also many outstanding issues, the answers to which are central to any attempt to effectively avoid 10,000 units being built on the side of our town and which for some reason we have been waiting months for our MP to find the time to raise. Consequently, I have written to the Secretary of State on behalf of the town to seek answers to these questions.

The current council administration’s position on this is clear and we would encourage local representatives who genuinely object to the proposals to focus on running an effective campaign, rather than paying lip service or issuing press releases with off-the-wall suggestions.


Dear Mr Jenrick,

As you may or may not be aware, Homes England—the Government’s housing delivery agency, are looking to build up to 10,000 houses immediately adjacent to our current urban area: West of Ifield.

Having reviewed these plans, we are concerned that the proposed development will cause significant ecological harm to our area, stretch the town’s infrastructure beyond what it is sustainable, and ultimately fail to deliver housing the town’s residents can actually afford.

In addition, the proposed housing would be constructed beneath the flightpath of the world’s busiest single-runway airport, in a floodplain, and assumes a level of employment need based on when Crawley had the highest density of jobs in the country, something which you will be aware from my past-correspondence is certainly no longer true.

While this development would see Crawley, the largest population centre in the county, increase its size by around a quarter, due to the land falling within the boundaries of Horsham District Council current planning rules means we will play no decision-making role around this proposal.

This is clearly a breach of natural justice, one which under current planning rules with a private developer we would just be forced to accept. Fortunately, Homes England are a public body and ultimately report to you, which is why I am writing to you now to raise a number of questions which have arisen over recent months:

1) The Chair of Horsham District Council’s Planning Committee has stated that: ‘The Housing Minister has INSTRUCTED us to build 30,000 houses over the next 25 years’, as the Housing Minister reports to you, can you confirm whether or not this is the case and if this instruction would require the West of Ifield development to be included within the council’s Local Plan?

2) Homes England report to the Government, have their targets set by the Government, and reportedly the development of the West of Ifield site has already been taken into account in their delivery targets. Could you confirm that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government are not pushing the development of the West of Ifield and would not provide no opposition should Homes England decide to not proceed with their current plans for the site?

3) The Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, grants Homes England the status of a planning authority where the Secretary of State has granted a designation order. Can you confirm that in the event that Horsham District Council do not grant planning permission for the development of land West of Ifield, no designation order will be granted for this site?

4) Homes England is the successor body of a long line of development agencies, stretching back to the original New Town Development Corporations. A number of these agencies had their own planning powers and comments from a past Chief Executive of Homes England have suggested that some of these powers might be used in the future to bring forward development where councils would not. In the event that they attempted to use these powers West of Ifield, could the Secretary of State confirm that he would intervene either directly with Homes England, such as through the use of his call-in power?

5) As previously outlined, in the event that Horsham District Council do grant permission for the development of West of Ifield, Crawley Borough Council and consequently Crawley residents will have no decision-making power over plans which will inevitably have a significant impact on the town’s future and which are allegedly about meeting the town’s needs. Will you intervene to ensure that a principal authority review can be carried out before any development takes place, ensuring that the local residents can decide for themselves how their town will develop by making Crawley Borough Council the decision-making authority?

6) If a principal authority is not possible within these timescales, as Homes England are a body reporting to your Ministry, will you require Homes England to pay the same heed to the requirements set out by Crawley Borough Council as if we were ourselves the local planning authority?

7) Alternatively, will you require that Homes England develop the site in a way which meets the bare minimum requirements identified to actually deliver a viable new community without substantially negatively impacting the town’s existing population, these being:

• That at least 40% of the housing is affordable (with a 70% social housing and 30% intermediate tenure mix)
• That there is the provision of a Western relief road, running all the way from the A264 to a junction at the North of the Manor Royal Business Park
• That the development follows the New Town’s ‘Neighbourhood Principal’ upon which Crawley was built, with services provided upfront and large quantities of urban green space
• That everything possible is done to minimise the environmental impact of any development, including the flood risk to adjacent areas

8) Lastly, if the development comes forward within the current boundaries, council tax and other forms of funding for providing services will be paid to Horsham District Council. Due to the development’s location the majority of the services accessed by residents will be paid for by Crawley Borough Council. This not only deprives those living West of Ifield with democratic input into the way their services are run, it will result in the borough suffering a significant increase in pressure on its services without the funding to improve capacity. At peak Crawley Borough Council had net revenue expenditure of £27m, cuts by this Government have forced our expenditure down to £13m, there is simply no way we can accommodate a 25% increase in demand within our current funding and still maintain local services at anything like their current level. In the event the development does go ahead and a principal area review is not possible, does the Secretary of State plan to make any changes to the level of financial support the council receives to adapt to the pressures brought on by an agency reporting to him?

Yours sincerely,

Cllr Peter Lamb
Leader, Crawley Borough Council